December 30

Oneshot | Words: Pipe Dreams

An episode where new words are discussed, match.com is review and Dr. Who is discovered.

Twat Aerator (noun) – a device used to access, my smell, the quality of vagina

Pipe Dream (noun) –  (1) the belief that you’ll receive fellatio (2) the imagining of great sex

Energy Level (noun) – (1) the overall quality of a woman (2) based on attraction how many “hit points” is a sexual partner worth

Olympdiks (noun) – the system of having frivolous sex for sport

 

 

 

  • Oneshot | Words: Turning The Page (mtrthenetwork.com)
Category: Blog, Oneshots, Podcasts | Comments Off on Oneshot | Words: Pipe Dreams
December 8

The Man You Need, The Douche Bag You Deserve

Riddle me this:

Who has the dating qualities you are looking for but you’ll never consider dating? Give up? The same blokes you’ve or many women have described as lame, creepy or thirsty – when the dude is not. Honestly, there are guys out there that get the unjust, generalization as every douche bag or asshat that has come to a girl looking to “chill” under the guise of genuinely getting to know a girl. While women want to be snowflakes (everyone is different). Many guy are foul – no personality, no goals, tons of lies and other bullshit and women have their guard up.

Where’s the cautious optimism?

Some guy believe treating dames like free throws ( they’re easy and you gotta know ’em down). However, Every guy isn’t this way – some like making half-court circus shots (I prefer the bank shot – the good old bank shot). I’ve been treating like a common foul, dude even before a conversation. It makes me not interesting but the belief is ” you stopped talking to me because I’m not going to have sex with you” (not true, honestly it’s not), “No, I stopped talking to you because there’s nothing to gain from you and the fact that you marginalizaed me furthers that asessment.” Women are terrible for this – this guilt driven ” like me only, under my terms” thing. Tangent aside: some guys are social awkward based in conditioning – by that: these guys are being themselves and the reciprocation is negative conditioning (i.e. no dates, no interest, bad dates and the belief that they’re somehow not “good enough”.
The irony is, women, for the sake of this submission, online dating women, want a good guy that’s genuinely interested in cultivating a real connection. I welcome that. There’s nothing better, for this guy, Good Ol’ Rob Lee, than learning about new things, people and places ( clearly, I like new nouns?).

The Macho Madness

For me it’s a vetting process too (hold on, urgh – there’s levels to this shit? and a method to my Macho

Domino mask

madness). I believe in the “what makes you so great” approach and having the text exchanges ( not the “wyd” horseshit), the phone conversations and the (the ones’s where you forget what time it is because the conversation is engrossing) and actual dates ( no me spending a grip for a faked up, narcism session) gives me that. It should give anyone that.
Doesn’t that have to be both ways? I’ve been inundated with women who want me to like all of there “splendid” personality – their quirks and so on. That’s fine but don’t try so hard to be quirky. That appears to be mask-ish, less Nolan Bane and more Robin domino mask (your mouth is running with possible lies, propagranda but I rather be looking into your eyes for the truth – the eyes are the gateway to the soul). Simply put: some women I’ve met are so into themselves, their narrative ( the one that’s written by, starring, choreographed and with a special appearance from themselves) that the guy they claim to want ( charming, has something going for them, attractive maybe a bit aloof/socially awkward) doesn’t have a chance. For instance: I get loads of “check out my instagram and you’ll see my journey” ( REALLY, you have time for me between galavanting and evading the paparazo) when I’m engaged in a conversation. Firstly, if I’m conversing with you, it means I WANT TO TALK TO YOU – I don’t want a referral to you’re selfies. I’m genuinely be interested in what you’re about ( goals, interests aspirations) but don’t refer me to you getting “turnt up” or wearing glasses and holding a PS3 controller with the caption, “nerd girl gaming”. That’s you’re online persona and Piss off! On the converse, I have a blog, a podcast and other interests (never said there great or even worthwhile) but the response is “what do you record in your mom’s basement?” and my retort should be “no, I record in YOUR mom’s basement”. I don’t like the typical treatment. Or the why are you this way on you’re podcast – you seem so…ba-ba-ba-bu-ba (whatever)? I’ve been hit with it and I punt (move the fuck on) That’s what these blokes are relegated to – lip services and getting to know someone instead of making a connection. Is that the intent or is it a give and take in this information sharing scenario?

Every dude isn’t a douch bag

Every guy isn’t EVERY guy. There’s terrible men and women in the dating scene. I think men are more OK on the surface with their shit ( the lies, womanizing and being horrible) and also are more logical insofar as there’s good women who exist ( they’re not necessary looking for them – they’re looking for free throws) but women try and rationalize and eddify themselves (I’m a princess, diva and so on while that’s setting themselves up to encounter Joe Douchbag and they’ll view the, admittedly Social awkard guy, through a douchbag prism – “OMG, why are men so terrible?”. No, no, no you’re terrible too. Let’s be terrible together, since the perception is there’s no “good guys out there”. Your vetting process is for shit and that skews what you get. You hunt, what you can catch ( RIP Patrice O’Neal). If you’re type A personality – why would you go after B’s ( going after bitches…yeah….no!). Work on you’re vetting and you’ll, man or woman, find someone as awesome (narcissistic) as you instagram illustrates.

RL

Category: Blog | Comments Off on The Man You Need, The Douche Bag You Deserve
November 23

A Note on Perception

Oy,

Recently, yer boy, Rob Lee, had a conversation about feminism and sexism. Essentially, the key takeaways were that feminism is racism. Sure there are very deep parallels ( such as ongoing treatment, violence and overall inequality)  – many, many ( I stress many) women are victims but not all. It’s irrational to belief that every woman is going to be a particular way – say every woman likes chocolate for example. Secondly, by being a male I would not, could not and should not attempt to understand the plight that women encounter daily – many, many ( I stress many) men are victimizers but not all. It is also irrational to believe that all men are out to victimize women, to harm women. Sure, I cannot understand that I am not and never will be a woman (thinly veiled sexism aside – I have tits though).  More to my actual point, I belief that these inequities and issues are prevalent in all cultures however I believe in the culture that are so up in arms about these injustices only focus on their side, their victimization and some of it is based in perception.

If you believe you “suck” you probably suck, things probably suck, people probably. If you believe you are a victim them you’re seeking supporting arguments, causes or instances where they or their gender group in this instance are victims. Based in this, one would believe that if I don’t get a job it’s because a man got it and somehow I’m a victim – ignoring the prospect that Melvin ( let’s use that name here) is more qualified than Meagan (she’s gonna be Meagan here). It’s akin to ” you didn’t hire me because I’m black”. I’m not here to say that the causes are wrong or flawed. I think the causes a misused by some vocal people who perceive that women are the only people who are victims. I read ( read up on this as I felt I was at a deficit) that the feminism cause is about equality and purely could be called humanism. If that is true, where are the instances where men’s lib are discussed or when males who can be victim ( although that lower numbers) are rallied about? The perception is that men are evil and men deserve what’s coming to them and what they do doesn’t make up for the rapists, the abusive husbands, the good ol’ boys and so on. However, if a woman hasn’t been victimized or isn’t up in arms about the cause or doesn’t find men inherently evil, she’s uninformed or stats will be mentioned to have her empathize that be a assimilated into this victim-borg. Just because someone was born with a penis doesn’t mean he’s going to oppress you. And, just because you’re born smaller, sans penis, into a world where males are perceived to control every and all, it doesn’t mean that you are weak, a victim or anything other than a person that is capable of doing great things.

This is my perception. After listening to the feminist, sexist arguments this week. I’ve concluded that if I say anything I do not understand but I’m stubborn and a vocal individual when things are equal. The feminist and sexist stances, at least how they’re used by some folks,  are unnecessary slanted to one-side. We require a balance. I like at many things from an innocuous prizm. For instance, I’m a surely, moody bloke and I’m often told to smile by women – guys don’t care. However if that’s flipped around it’s sexist – there’s a movement I hear on this. The minute women a movement is mentioned or the “you won’t understand because” or the “did you know” is mentioned, the argument or point loses validity. The key point in the argument is for a man to tell a woman to smile is for the male’s benefit ( you’d be more pleasing to MY eye) and to show his power. OK is this sexist? I’ve been told to shave my beard by women as well because I’d look better. I’m sure I’ll be told no because it’s different. It’s the perception that men can’t understand what women go through and similar treatment can’t happen to men. That’s something men have to accept as fact. On the sexist note, there’s antiquated bullshit that still goes on so I understand it at it’s root. The man makes the money and woman keeps the house in order. It’s archaic and impractical these days yet the perception here is that women are expected to know how to cook and clean. I think everyone should know how to cook and clean – those duties shouldn’t be left to one person – gender blinded. If women are expected to cook all the time then that’s a problem and IT IS SEXIST. However is it not sexist for a man – as he’s believed to make more money or whatever, to have to pay for dinner every time you folks go out as a couple. If he doesn’t pay or gripes about it then he’s less of a man or cheap or a loser (not degradation)  Oh no, that’s no where near being possibly viewed as sexist – that’s called traditional or old fashioned. Is it sexist for a man to have to be a protector? Why can’t he be a pussy? It’s cherry picking instances of sexism to validate your point. Both genders are effected, women more and traditionally, while men are effected in a different way and generally men aren’t vocal about their victimization. There’s differences certainly.

In closing, I don’t either side understands the plight that the other side experiences. I prefer to love and hate people equally. I tend to be indifferent to all until I have enough information to make a judgment – my derivative of the innocent until proven guilty. I find that some women take the asshole/rapist/”he doesn’t care about women” view of men until proven otherwise – but the catch is you can’t prove them otherwise because that equates power  and they’re “powerless”. Women here because I haven’t spoken to men or women in other countries, hell other cities, have more power then they has 10 years ago but the perception is that women have no power because there are still men around. But perception does a lot to help in the understanding here. If you have a shitty look on your face, one would assume you’re having a bad day and may be trying to empathize and cheer you up. But if you have the preconceived notion that this man ( backtracking) is trying to dominate you into improving your mood then you can only be unreceptive. I don’t claim to know anything and I welcome anyone who doesn’t agree with what I’ve typed to sway me but I reserve the right to that the femy-sexisty approach and say you won’t understand.

RL

Category: Blog | Comments Off on A Note on Perception
October 25

Mtrocast 2 | The Womanizer and Watersports

An episodes where the Robs discuss online dating.

Category: Mtrocast, Podcasts | Comments Off on Mtrocast 2 | The Womanizer and Watersports
October 15

Mastermind Team’s Robcast 93 | Loving With Your Heart

An episode where government shutdown and ambition is discussed.

Category: Blog, Mastermind Team's Robcast, Podcasts | Comments Off on Mastermind Team’s Robcast 93 | Loving With Your Heart